How is the government seriously gonna deal with massive debt without collapsing on itself or raising taxes? - government
The government is now a giant Ponzi scheme, Youre the payment of taxes for the people of the Social Security and Medicare coverage, even if they have paid for it when they were younger. However, the government gave the money, and now pay with cash, and nothing happens to the savings. Do you think that this is true?
8 comments:
They will raise taxes
And this is completely wrong.
Must be paid when they were younger, do not cover, but to cover their parents. They meet their parents. Their children are treated. Your grandchildren will cover their children.
This is called the inherited debt. Each generation pays for the ones that preceded it. The only way Social Security would be no more money for you, whether the generation of people will die of the last generation of people to people.
You may not get all the advantages) promised them, especially since Bush gutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (paying for them to pay $ 3 billion to U.S. war in Iraq without the taxes, hence the high debt. .. Oh, and the fact that they have children at a pace fast enough to cover our retreat ... But this is something that as long as there is a new generation of people.
I mean, if you want to pay more, can Social Security, we can. But then there is no one for their parents, and they need to go home andor. At which you will pay more for it, and only point.
And this is completely wrong.
Must be paid when they were younger, do not cover, but to cover their parents. They meet their parents. Their children are treated. Your grandchildren will cover their children.
This is called the inherited debt. Each generation pays for the ones that preceded it. The only way Social Security would be no more money for you, whether the generation of people will die of the last generation of people to people.
You may not get all the advantages) promised them, especially since Bush gutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (paying for them to pay $ 3 billion to U.S. war in Iraq without the taxes, hence the high debt. .. Oh, and the fact that they have children at a pace fast enough to cover our retreat ... But this is something that as long as there is a new generation of people.
I mean, if you want to pay more, can Social Security, we can. But then there is no one for their parents, and they need to go home andor. At which you will pay more for it, and only point.
Remember to ballance the budget of prosperity under Clinton, just before the bursting of the tech bubble?
More jobs, more workers
Several workers, higher wages
More pay, more tax revenue
More tax revenue and you can pay the deficit and debt.
S, what happened with Clinton, but with permanent jobs, which no explosion bubble
For example, manufacturing, infrastructure maintenance and Healthcare
[And if we're at it, what the salary of the teachers a decent wage?]
We were able to follow the good and go bad if it competitive in the market.
Increase competitiveness, pay more!
[By the way, with the work on all child care is available and enables you to use the teachers were friendly and has children, but not simply make the cut.]
Remember to ballance the budget of prosperity under Clinton, just before the bursting of the tech bubble?
More jobs, more workers
Several workers, higher wages
More pay, more tax revenue
More tax revenue and you can pay the deficit and debt.
S, what happened with Clinton, but with permanent jobs, which no explosion bubble
For example, manufacturing, infrastructure maintenance and Healthcare
[And if we're at it, what the salary of the teachers a decent wage?]
We were able to follow the good and go bad if it competitive in the market.
Increase competitiveness, pay more!
[By the way, with the work on all child care is available and enables you to use the teachers were friendly and has children, but not simply make the cut.]
OK, here's a little secret. Our national debt need not be repaid. The country does not fall well.
Simply roll over the debt, which is a compensation for the sale of new loans, and go on our merry way. The point here is to serve the interests of the national debt.
Here are the key! The growth of debt is acceptable, while controlling the rate of growth will grow faster than the long-term revenue. And therein lies the problem on its own expenses of Obama, the debt is growing faster than the economy and tax revenues that come from there.
Watch the short video about the issues related to our notions of public debt in context.
Not surprising. I think the government needs to demonstrate some real fiscal responsibility by reducing the cost of only the essentials. A member of Congress, if you have at least $ 1 million of assets and income (excluding the current salary of members of Congress) should, in conjunction, a salary of $ 1 per year. They must stop the funding in the field of alternative energies and that oil companies to extract oil in the United States. Then, after more autonomy, they can look into green energy.
Not surprising. I think the government needs to demonstrate some real fiscal responsibility by reducing the cost of only the essentials. A member of Congress, if you have at least $ 1 million of assets and income (excluding the current salary of members of Congress) should, in conjunction, a salary of $ 1 per year. They must stop the funding in the field of alternative energies and that oil companies to extract oil in the United States. Then, after more autonomy, they can look into green energy.
Post a Comment